πŸ“ŠπŸšœ DEFRA has finally published the detail on SFI26

Tom Scrope
Feb 25th, 2026
β€’
3 min read
Click here to view original post on LinkedIn.

UPDATE: Our mapping wizard Richard has produced this super little tool to answer any questions you might have about SFI26: https://sfi26.soilbenchmark.com/

‍

πŸ“ŠπŸšœ DEFRA has finally published the detail on SFI26:

My take (comparing it to the latest take-up data I've been tracking πŸ€“): this looks like a pretty sensible reset if the main goal is to spread the budget across more farms.

Stacked bar chart of SFI agreements over time, April 2024 to November 2025, split into SFI23 and SFI24, rising to about 44,500
Live SFI agreements from April 2024 to November 2025, split between SFI23 and SFI24.

‍

It’s a clear shift in approach:

πŸ‘‰ less money for paperwork

πŸ‘‰ lower rates on some of the most expensive actions

πŸ‘‰ more focus on caps / access / value for money

‍

TL;DR

πŸ“Œ 71 actions (down from 102)

Rates cut for SAM3 / AHL2 / NUM3

Management payment & 5 planning actions removed

1st window for 3-50ha farms

Β£100k cap

‍

1) DEFRA has gone straight after the expensive actions

πŸ’°Using latest SFI take-up figures (to Nov), the 3 reduced-rate actions (SAM3, AHL2, NUM3) were worth Β£316m/yr combined. That’s more than β…“ total annual SFI cost (Β£942m).

Table ranking the top 22 SFI actions by current annual spend, out of a total of Β£941.5m, colour-coded increased, flat, reduced or scrapped
The 22 SFI actions with the highest current annual spend, coloured by whether SFI26 increased, kept, reduced or scrapped them.

‍

At the new rates, those same 3 actions would pay Β£96m less = saving 10% of the budget.

Table of SFI spend by category, comparing number of actions, total spend and share of budget at SFI23/24 rates and at SFI26 rates
SFI spend by category at SFI23/24 rates (Β£942m) and at the new SFI26 rates (Β£686m).

‍

2) Simplification: mostly sensible βœ‚οΈ

Around β…” of removed actions were in fewer than 100 agreements each (vs SAM1 used in 27,700!)

Full table ranking every SFI action by current annual spend with its category and cumulative share, colour-coded increased, flat, reduced or scrapped
The full ranking of SFI actions by current annual spend, with the ones increased, reduced or scrapped in SFI26 highlighted.

‍

One oddity: HEF1 (maintain trad. farm buildings) is only on 80ha, but at £5/sqm it adds up to £90m! Feels a strange one to keep if the stated focus is environmental outcomes 🀷

‍

3) Biggest shift in approach: 😡 plans πŸ“

Removing management payment + the 5 planning actions saves Β£135m/yr (14% of budget).Some of that is understandable - IPM1 became very tick-box.

But there’s a missed opportunity I think. The value in these plans wasn't the document itself. It was using the plan to start better conversations.

That’s the bit they were trying to get at: mindset shift.

So if not plans, then what replaces that?

πŸ‘‰ more enforcement?

πŸ‘‰ easier tools?

πŸ‘‰ more advisor support?

πŸ‘‰ farmer groups?

This is exactly the territory of my Nuffield work (linktr.ee/tscrope) so I’ll be watching the new Β£30m Farmer Collaboration Fund closely.

‍

4) Access / fairness: probably more farms get in 🀝

The cap + rate cuts + removals should definitely mean more farms can access SFI (hard to quantify exactly yet).

But scrapping the management payment will hit smaller farms hardest.

‍

5) What it means for us at Soil Benchmark πŸͺ±πŸ’»

SAM1 was a big part of how we've got to 1.2m ha on the platform in a little over 2 years (30% of SAM1 area).

Table ranking SFI area-based actions by hectares covered, colour-coded increased, flat, reduced or scrapped, with CSAM1 top at 3,879,000 ha
SFI area-based actions ranked by area covered. CSAM1, now scrapped, was the largest at 3.88m ha.

‍

First the SFI pause, and now this, has definitely made us grateful we didn’t just rest on our laurels with SAM1 and instead followed what customers were asking for next:

πŸ’© manure spreading maps

πŸ—ΊοΈ NVZ plans

πŸ§ͺ nutrient management

πŸ› NEW: spray recommendations

πŸ˜… phew.

And with the disruption in the UK agronomy software market right now, we’ve (again) got lucky with timing.

‍

6) Overall verdict

Access βœ…

Simplification βœ…

Environmental impact❓

The key test is how much lower rates on the big actions reduce uptake (and so environmental delivery overall)

‍

Key questions now 🧭

πŸ’· Budgets?

πŸ€” What replaces the role the management plans were trying to support in terms of mindset shift?

‍

Keen to get your takeπŸ‘‡

Subscribe to newsletter

Subscribe to receive the latest blog posts to your inbox.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Your new Farm Management Software - get started today

We're excited to invite you to one of our upcoming introductory webinars:
"Soil Benchmark - the full tour"
Sign up using the link below: