UPDATE: Our mapping wizard Richard has produced this super little tool to answer any questions you might have about SFI26: https://sfi26.soilbenchmark.com/
β
ππ DEFRA has finally published the detail on SFI26:
My take (comparing it to the latest take-up data I've been tracking π€): this looks like a pretty sensible reset if the main goal is to spread the budget across more farms.

β
Itβs a clear shift in approach:
π less money for paperwork
π lower rates on some of the most expensive actions
π more focus on caps / access / value for money
β
TL;DR
π 71 actions (down from 102)
Rates cut for SAM3 / AHL2 / NUM3
Management payment & 5 planning actions removed
1st window for 3-50ha farms
Β£100k cap
β
1) DEFRA has gone straight after the expensive actions
π°Using latest SFI take-up figures (to Nov), the 3 reduced-rate actions (SAM3, AHL2, NUM3) were worth Β£316m/yr combined. Thatβs more than β total annual SFI cost (Β£942m).

β
At the new rates, those same 3 actions would pay Β£96m less = saving 10% of the budget.

β
2) Simplification: mostly sensible βοΈ
Around β of removed actions were in fewer than 100 agreements each (vs SAM1 used in 27,700!)

β
One oddity: HEF1 (maintain trad. farm buildings) is only on 80ha, but at Β£5/sqm it adds up to Β£90m! Feels a strange one to keep if the stated focus is environmental outcomes π€·
β
3) Biggest shift in approach: π΅ plans π
Removing management payment + the 5 planning actions saves Β£135m/yr (14% of budget).Some of that is understandable - IPM1 became very tick-box.
But thereβs a missed opportunity I think. The value in these plans wasn't the document itself. It was using the plan to start better conversations.
Thatβs the bit they were trying to get at: mindset shift.
So if not plans, then what replaces that?
π more enforcement?
π easier tools?
π more advisor support?
π farmer groups?
This is exactly the territory of my Nuffield work (linktr.ee/tscrope) so Iβll be watching the new Β£30m Farmer Collaboration Fund closely.
β
4) Access / fairness: probably more farms get in π€
The cap + rate cuts + removals should definitely mean more farms can access SFI (hard to quantify exactly yet).
But scrapping the management payment will hit smaller farms hardest.
β
5) What it means for us at Soil Benchmark πͺ±π»
SAM1 was a big part of how we've got to 1.2m ha on the platform in a little over 2 years (30% of SAM1 area).

β
First the SFI pause, and now this, has definitely made us grateful we didnβt just rest on our laurels with SAM1 and instead followed what customers were asking for next:
π© manure spreading maps
πΊοΈ NVZ plans
π§ͺ nutrient management
π NEW: spray recommendations
π phew.
And with the disruption in the UK agronomy software market right now, weβve (again) got lucky with timing.
β
6) Overall verdict
Access β
Simplification β
Environmental impactβ
The key test is how much lower rates on the big actions reduce uptake (and so environmental delivery overall)
β
Key questions now π§
π· Budgets?
π€ What replaces the role the management plans were trying to support in terms of mindset shift?
β
Keen to get your takeπ


.png)


