Omnia, from the agronomy and input business Hutchinsons, has been the main winner as farms move off Gatekeeper. It is a slick system, strong on mapping, reporting and compliance, and its users rate it. But the same complaints come up again and again: the cost, especially on bigger farms, the fact that it belongs to a company that also sells you inputs, and how fiddly some of the data entry is.
This page sets out those problems, how Soil Benchmark answers each one, and where Omnia is still stronger. We make Soil Benchmark, so we have tried to be straight about both.
The problems Omnia users raise most
| The problem | What Omnia users say | How Soil Benchmark answers it |
|---|---|---|
| The price | "Nothing is cheap but it does seem quite expensive. (£6k in my case annually)" Omnia user, The Farming Forum, 2024 | £475 +VAT per farm per year for everything, whatever the farm size. Planning is free. |
| Owned by an input supplier | Buying groups and independent agronomists tell us they are uneasy putting the prices they have negotiated into a system owned by a supplier they compete with on price | Independent. We don't sell inputs or data, and we aren't a competitor to our users. |
| Fiddly data entry | "Data entry is a total ballache. For example if I want to create a drill plan including Avadex and fertiliser to be applied in the same operation I need to create 3 separate plans." Omnia user, The Farming Forum, January 2025 | Built around how farmers and agronomists actually work, from their feedback. The Farmers Weekly reviewer rated our usability "top notch". |
| Expensive for agronomists with many farms | Priced per hectare on every farm | SB Agronomist is £500 a year across every farm you advise, and drops each per-farm product to £150. |
Quotes are from public threads on The Farming Forum. For all eight main systems side by side, see our full UK farm management software comparison.


%20(1).png)